Usually less than buyers expect. Refresh rate does raise power use, but brightness, HDR, screen size, and daily runtime usually matter more than the jump from 144Hz to 240Hz.
If you are pricing out a 165Hz or 240Hz Mini LED gaming monitor, the worry is easy to understand: better motion, better HDR, and a brighter backlight all sound like a bigger monthly bill. Real-world notes suggest the desktop gap between 60Hz and 165Hz can be only about 1W, while HDR and max brightness can move the number much more. The useful question is not whether high refresh uses more power, but when that extra power becomes noticeable and how to control it.
Refresh Rate Matters, but It Is Rarely the Main Cost Driver
The refresh-rate penalty is usually modest
Higher refresh rates generally increase monitor power use, because the display electronics have to refresh the image more often. In practice, though, the increase is often small compared with the rest of the monitor’s workload. A community test on a laptop model reported roughly a 1W difference between 60Hz and 165Hz at an idle desktop, which is a useful reminder that refresh rate alone does not usually blow up a power bill.
Lowering refresh rate can reduce display energy use, especially on laptops and mixed-use systems, so the effect is real. But for a desktop gaming monitor, the monthly cost change from refresh rate alone is often measured in fractions of a dollar unless you run the display for long hours every day.
Brightness, HDR, size, and resolution do more damage
Brightness is the biggest driver of monitor draw, which is why a high-refresh display at 55% brightness can be cheaper to run than a slower monitor parked at 100% brightness. HDR makes this more obvious because the backlight has to push much harder for bright highlights.
HDR can raise power consumption to about 2x, and larger screens and higher resolutions also lift usage. For monitor buyers, that means the jump from a 27-inch SDR panel to a bright ultrawide or 4K HDR model usually matters more than the jump from 165Hz to 240Hz on the spec sheet.

What Mini LED Changes in the Power Equation
Local dimming can save energy in darker content
Mini-LED monitors use much smaller LEDs and more precise local dimming, which is the key reason they can look dramatically better than standard edge-lit LCD gaming monitors. That same local control can also help energy efficiency, because dim or dark parts of the image do not need the entire backlight running at full force.
Local dimming and dynamic power management are central energy-saving methods, so Mini LED is not automatically a power hog. If you play darker games, watch movies with lots of shadow detail, or spend work hours in normal SDR mode, the technology can use its backlight more selectively than a simpler always-bright design.
Bright HDR and heat can erase that advantage
The main power draw in Mini LED displays comes from the backlight array, driver circuits, and thermal management. That matters because the main reason people buy Mini LED monitors is not efficiency alone. They buy them for high peak brightness, stronger HDR, and better contrast, and those strengths often push the backlight harder than a typical office monitor would.
Driver design and power architecture still matter a lot, which is why two Mini LED monitors with similar size and refresh rate can differ noticeably in wall power. Better backlight efficiency, better voltage delivery, and better heat handling can cut waste, while hotter operation tends to reduce LED efficiency and increase the energy needed to maintain brightness.
Sample Monthly Cost Scenarios for Gaming Monitors
A quick way to estimate your bill
A modern 27-inch 144Hz gaming monitor typically uses about 30W to 50W during gameplay, while some 240Hz models can reach about 30W to 80W. To estimate monthly energy use, multiply watts by hours per day by 30, then divide by 1,000 to get kWh.
The table below uses a sample electricity rate of $0.11 per kWh, matching the rate used in a TV cost example cited in this discussion. If your local rate is higher, multiply the kWh figure by your own rate.
Setup |
Assumed Power |
Daily Use |
Monthly Energy |
Sample Monthly Cost |
60Hz vs. 165Hz desktop difference |
+1W |
8 hours |
+0.24 kWh |
+$0.03 |
27-inch 144Hz SDR gaming monitor |
30W to 50W |
5 hours |
4.5 to 7.5 kWh |
$0.50 to $0.83 |
27-inch 240Hz SDR gaming monitor |
30W to 80W |
5 hours |
4.5 to 12.0 kWh |
$0.50 to $1.32 |
HDR enabled on a 40W monitor if usage doubles to 80W |
+40W |
5 hours |
+6.0 kWh |
+$0.66 |
Power use rises with larger screens, higher resolution, and higher brightness, so a large ultrawide Mini LED monitor will usually sit above these smaller 27-inch examples. That is the more realistic place to expect a noticeable bump: not from refresh rate by itself, but from combining a bigger panel, more pixels, and a brighter HDR backlight.
When the Extra Cost Actually Matters in a Buying Decision
One monitor is usually cheap; a full battlestation is where it adds up
The monthly cost difference for extra refresh-rate power is small in typical single-monitor use. If you game a few hours a night, the jump from a decent 144Hz monitor to a faster Mini LED model is usually not a deal-breaker on the power bill by itself.
Standby monitors often sit around 3W, while idle desktop towers can use about 30W to 100W, so the bigger energy story is often the whole setup. A dual- or triple-monitor desk, an always-on gaming PC, console passthrough, speakers, and RGB lighting will shift the bill more than a single refresh-rate upgrade.

Buying class matters more than a spec-sheet race
Screen size and active power are major parts of energy labeling. For a buyer choosing between two 27-inch monitors, 165Hz versus 240Hz is usually a secondary power question. For a buyer choosing between a standard 27-inch panel and a bright 34-inch ultrawide Mini LED HDR model, energy use becomes a much more meaningful comparison point.
Mini-LED is attractive because it improves brightness, contrast, and HDR performance, which means the technology makes the most sense when you will actually use those benefits. Even with a 27-inch 180Hz Mini LED option like a monitor model, brightness and HDR habits will usually matter more to power cost than refresh rate alone. If most of your time is web browsing, office work, and occasional gaming, paying a little more on the power bill for a flagship Mini LED panel may be harder to justify than it is for someone who regularly plays HDR games or edits high-brightness video.
How to Lower Power Use Without Giving Up the Best Parts
Use refresh intelligently instead of locking max Hz all day
An operating system supports Dynamic Refresh Rate on supported displays, which lets the system drop refresh when you are reading, browsing, or writing, then ramp it back up when motion matters. That is a clean way to keep the smooth feel of a high-refresh monitor without paying the full-time power penalty.
A familiar real-world pattern is moderate SDR during work and high refresh only during games. If that sounds like your desk, it makes sense to keep your maximum refresh rate for gaming sessions and use a lower or dynamic mode during the rest of the day.
Cut the settings that drive backlight load the hardest
Running brightness at 50% to 60% instead of 100% can materially reduce monitor power use, and turning off HDR outside games and movies is often the simplest win. On many Mini LED monitors, SDR desktop work does not need the same backlight intensity that HDR gameplay does.
Ambient-light adjustment, eco modes, and better power management are proven ways to reduce display energy use. If you want actual proof from your own setup instead of estimates, a smart plug or home energy monitor is worth using; data-driven home monitoring is built around exactly that idea.

FAQ
Q: Does 240Hz always cost more to run than 165Hz?
A: Usually yes, but the increase is often modest compared with brightness and HDR. If both monitors are similar in size and brightness, the refresh-rate gap may only add a small monthly cost.
Q: Are Mini LED monitors more efficient than regular LED monitors?
A: Sometimes. Local dimming can reduce wasted backlight power in darker scenes, but bright HDR output, extra backlight zones, and heat can push total usage higher in real-world gaming.
Q: Should I turn my monitor off completely every night?
A: If you want the biggest energy savings, shutting down the PC matters more than worrying about monitor standby. Still, on multi-monitor setups, turning displays fully off when you are done can trim a little more waste.
Final Takeaway
A high-refresh Mini LED monitor usually adds only a modest amount to a monthly electric bill unless you also run high brightness, HDR, and long daily hours. For most gaming-monitor buyers, the real power question is not 165Hz versus 240Hz. It is whether you are stepping into a larger, brighter, HDR-heavy display class.
If you want the short buying rule, use this: 1. Compare screen size, HDR brightness, and daily runtime before you worry about refresh rate. 2. Expect a single monitor’s extra cost to stay fairly small, but watch full-desk setups more closely. 3. Use Dynamic Refresh Rate, moderate brightness, and SDR for everyday desktop work to keep Mini LED benefits without paying for maximum backlight all day.
References
- A company: How to Reduce Energy Consumption in Mini LED TVs
- A company: Exploring Power Consumption in Mini/Micro LED Displays
- A company: Power Usage & Your Gaming Rig
- A company support page: Change the refresh rate on your monitor in an operating system
- A company: How much energy does your monitor consume?
- A company: How much energy does your monitor consume?
- A company: Why Choose a Mini LED Monitor?
- A community forum: 60hz vs 165hz Display Power Draw
- A forum: 3 monitor electricity bill
- A company: Control your home energy use
- A platform discussion citing TV calculator examples





